LVS
lvs-users
Google
 
Web LinuxVirtualServer.org

Re: binding 2 persistence rules/routes...

To: "LinuxVirtualServer.org users mailing list." <lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Roberto Nibali <ratz@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: binding 2 persistence rules/routes...
From: Joseph Mack <mack.joseph@xxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2003 08:08:40 -0400
Roberto Nibali wrote:

> 
> You have a broken :) service which you would like to load balance with 
> persistence.

If it wasn't broken, what would it do?

Joe

> Normal state of affairs
> -----------------------
> client A sends http request to VIP:80 and gets to RIP1:80
> client A receives some new port information (31337) in the reply
> client A sends some request to VIP:31337 and gets to RIP2:31337 where the
> service of course will not have opened the port because RIP1 did.
> 
> Port 0 state of affairs
> -----------------------
> client A sends http request to VIP:80 and gets to RIP1:80
> client A receives some new port information (31337) in the reply
> client A sends some request to VIP:31337 and gets to RIP1:31337 which is very
> happily accepting the connection because it told the client A to connect to 
> this
> port.

-- 
Joseph Mack PhD, High Performance Computing & Scientific Visualization
SAIC, Supporting the EPA Research Triangle Park, NC 919-541-0007
Federal Contact - John B. Smith 919-541-1087 - smith.johnb@xxxxxxx
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>