|
On Tue, Jul 15, 2003 at 10:05:49AM +0200, Stephan Wonczak wrote:
>
> If some client machine has to do a new arp-request, sometimes the now
> secondary machines answeres it! Meaning: Machine B is director, having
> taken over service from machine A, but both are still running. This
> happens e.g. during maintenance. Machine B has both :0 and :1-Adresses,
> machine A does no longer (verifiable by ifconfig).
> Using tcpdump we could see machine A still answering arp-requests for
> the public LVS-Address, even though it is now assigned to machine B who
> *should* be answering. Huh? The funny thing is, this migration of IP
> adresses on virtual interfaces forks just fine without this problem for
> numerous other services, only ipvs seems to produce the problem with the
> ARPs.
Is the IP address still attached to an interface (alias or otherwise)
in Linux Director A?
--
Horms
|
