|
On Thu, Jul 31, 2003 at 10:12:14PM +0200, Christian Wicke wrote:
> Hello Horms
>
> thanks for your explanation.
>
> > Currently LVS supports 2.a. 1 is also possible to set up
> > but probably not desirable. 2.b was what I was trying to describe,
> > it is not supported. 2.c is just a variabt of that, and if 2.b was
> > supported it could be done too, but 2.b isn't supported. 2.d is
> > possible, but isn't LVS.
>
> Do you mean 2d (do Load Balancing based on the session id extracted from the
> request) is possible, but not supported yet in LVS?
> Or do you mean it is possible with some other software but won't be with LVS?
The latter. LVS works at layer 4 so fundamentally it doesn't have
the capability to handle session ids.
>
> Thanks again,
> Christian
--
Horms
|
