|
On Wed, Aug 27, 2003 at 12:57:17PM -0400, Joseph Mack wrote:
> Horms wrote:
> >
> > Did we need it for fwmarks? If we did then the current behaviour
> > is the same as it has always been.
>
> http://www.linuxvirtualserver.org/Joseph.Mack/HOWTO/LVS-HOWTO.routing_tricks.html
>
> you needed to do something to identify each (V)IP can was covered by
> the fwmark rules and arrange for those packets to be delivered
> locally. I thought it was a kludge to write two sets of rules, one for
> ipvs and another for local delivery. I thought you should be able to
> do something like saying "deliver locally all packets with fwmark==1"
Understood. That had slipped my mind.
--
Horms
|
