|
----- Original Message -----
From: "Ariyo Nugroho" <ariyo@xxxxxxxxxx>
To: "LinuxVirtualServer.org users mailing list."
<lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, November 05, 2003 1:34 AM
Subject: Re: Choosing distributed filesystem (just how far off topic are
wenow ??)
>
> I'm sorry for this late answer. Frankly, I need quite enough time to
> digest your posting, John :) I never tried failover yet. That's why. I'm
> sorry. So far, all I know is just building LVS-NAT, for single and multi
> ports. (There's still many things to catch up then. Yeah! Keep
> fighting!)
>
> Anyway, thank you for your suggestion, John. I'll refer it back again,
> whenever I figure out those 'advanced' terms :)
>
>
Yes, that initial set of ideas was a bit more complicated than needed, do
check my later post about setting up mysql replication :)
failover: having 2 machines configured to run the same server process -- but
only one of the runs the process at any time -- using heartbeat to have one
machine grab the VIP and start the server process when the other machine
fails. heartbeat+ldirectord is a common setup for having redundant load
balancers, but heartbeat can start any proccess (apache, mysql, ftpd, shell
script, etc) when it takes control of the VIP from a failed machine
|
