Thank you. Any other opinions would be great
-----Original Message-----
From: lvs-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:lvs-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Peter
Mueller
Sent: Friday, November 14, 2003 5:12 PM
To: 'LinuxVirtualServer.org users mailing list.'
Cc: mack.joseph@xxxxxxx
Subject: RE: LVS & MAC ADDRESS ISSUES
> alive should use the MAC address of the failing node. This
> causes delays in the failover for my switches and router. I
> was thinking about VRRP. However, there should be another way.
Don't re-invent the wheel; use keepalived (http://www.keepalived.org) or
ultramonkey (www.ultramonkey.org)
> VIP
> ______|_____
> | |
> __|___ ___|__
> | | | |
> | | | |
> |______| |______|
> \<--->/
> MAC 002123 MAC 987689
I'm not sure how this ascii art makes me feel. On the one hand it is always
nice to see ascii, but on the other hand there's something sinister about
this art..
Cheers,
Peter
_______________________________________________
LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Send requests to lvs-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
or go to http://www.in-addr.de/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users
|