LVS
lvs-users
Google
 
Web LinuxVirtualServer.org

Re: A problem about LVS/NAT

To: "LinuxVirtualServer.org users mailing list." <lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: A problem about LVS/NAT
From: Joseph Mack <mack.joseph@xxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 30 Nov 2003 13:37:53 -0500
Roberto Nibali wrote:

> > For security reason, ssl based ftp was required .After
> > added ssl based ftp auth to real servers,client computers can not connect to
> > real server by using passive mode.But in port mode it works well.
> 
> IIRC you need to load balance port 22 too.

I had a quick look at an sftp session with a file transfer, with `netstat -an`
looking for services in ESTABLISHED and TIME_WAIT etc, and the whole thing 
appears
to be a single port service on port 22. It only looks like ftp at the command
line.

hmm, just realised he's talking about ssl based ftp, not sftp

never mind

Joe

-- 
Joseph Mack PhD, High Performance Computing & Scientific Visualization
SAIC, Supporting the EPA Research Triangle Park, NC 919-541-0007
Federal Contact - John B. Smith 919-541-1087 - smith.johnb@xxxxxxx
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>