LVS
lvs-users
Google
 
Web LinuxVirtualServer.org

Re: lvs_dr https problem

To: "LinuxVirtualServer.org users mailing list." <lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: lvs_dr https problem
From: "Justin Albstmeijer" <justin@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2003 16:22:59 +0100 (CET)
>> I would expect ip:https or ip:443 instead of ip:0
>> Also tried SERVICE=t 443 rr 192.168.1.101 192.168.1.102 192.168.1.103
>
> 443 and https are interchangeable via /etc/services, so you aren't doing
> anything different by changing "https" to "443".
>
> It's (ahem) a feature. The script is mainly designed for my testing
> and is out there to help newbies setting up LVS. It does a lot
> of checking and gives hints as to the problem when it fails.
> It also has some "smarts" - if you're running https, you want persistence
> to keep the client on the same realserver. Back when I wrote the
> script, port 0 was the way of handling this.

It still seems to be the case.. works for me.

>If you're going into
> production today with an https/http site, you'd probably use persistent
> fwmarks.

Where can I find info on this?

>
> If you want to setup a non-persistent service on port 443 and have got the
> hang
> of how LVS works, then you should just set it up from the command
> line with ipvsadm
>

I just removed https from @persistent_services in the configure script.



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>