|
Thanks for your reply .
Its that fast switching of Keepalived and 2+ director master/master
configuration on different
subnet . I had no problem at all with Ldirectord .
How envolved is it to setup the same using Ldirectord .
Any links appretiated .
thanks again
----- Original Message -----
From: "Peter Mueller" <pmueller@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: "'LinuxVirtualServer.org users mailing list.'"
<lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Monday, January 05, 2004 3:21 PM
Subject: RE: Keepalived to replace ldirectord
> > I have LVS-DR running using ldirectord on a RH7.3 for mixed
> > windows and linux servers. Asking opinion on using keepalived
> > instead of ldirectord to enable director failovers. Any
> > input is appreciated .
>
> Why are you thinking of switching? Each piece of software has its
> advantages and disadvantages.
>
> Keepalived - architecture results in instant (<2 sec) failover,
> master/master or 3+ directors is possible.
> Ldirectord - more mature (less error prone), you already have it setup &
> working, and you can use extra communication with heartbeat (e.g. serial
> cable).
>
> Cheers,
>
> Peter
> _______________________________________________
> LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Send requests to lvs-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> or go to http://www.in-addr.de/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users
>
---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.558 / Virus Database: 350 - Release Date: 1/2/2004
|
