|
this is a right way if you just have one machine,but it need the computer to
be more powerful.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Ariyo Nugroho" <ariyo@xxxxxxxxxx>
To: "LinuxVirtualServer.org users mailing list."
<lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, January 06, 2004 2:20 PM
Subject: Testing LVS using virtual machines with VMware
>
> Hi Guys!
>
>
>
> It's been a quite long time I didn't tune to LVS. I never really had my
LVS
> running nor used it in real world. I just did a test with LVS-NAT, saw
that
> it really worked, and "Hmm.. what a great tool!" But nothing more. The
> problem is I don't have enough machines to do it all. (Psst.. It's secret,
> but I only have one PC! ;) So, I abandoned my test until I can get more
> machines of my own, not borrowed.
>
>
>
> Then my friend came with his story about Vmware. I guess some of you have
> ever heard, or may be have used it. He said that he can have 2 OS (Windows
> 2000 and RedHat 9) run simultaneusly on his PC. And it can be more than 2.
I
> was surprised when he said that those OS can access the other's services
> each other. And more, both OS are exposed to the outside world. It's
because
> every addition of new 'guess OS' will be equipped with new virtual network
> interfaces. Shortly, each OS acts as a definitely 'real' machine.
>
>
>
> Wow! I think it's a solution for me. I'm going to build my (testing) LVS
on
> it. I could have 1 director, 2 realservers, and 1 client, all in one PC
(of
> course I must upgrade my memories and harddisk first). But first, let me
> hear what you think about this, guys. May be I miss some important parts?
>
>
>
> Best regards,
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Ariyo
>
> _______________________________________________
> LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Send requests to lvs-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> or go to http://www.in-addr.de/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users
>
|
