|
Hello,
Salvatore D. Tepedino wrote:
On Wed, 2004-01-21 at 03:49, Laurent Neiger wrote:
Is it possible to have this topology using LVS (possibly with heartbeat, fake,
mon, ...) or with another vitual server ?
Yes (as Joe pointed out). I've set one up before and it works well.
Here's a page that explains how it's done. (Note: You do not have to use
the ultramonkey packages if you don't want to. I didn't and it worked
fine)
http://www.ultramonkey.org/2.0.1/topologies/sl-ha-lb-overview.html
Thank you very much Salvatore. I would like to thank Joseph too, for his answer.
I was about to post again to ask him how could I achieve such a model, now I
know it is possible as it was done, but your message provided me all the hints I
need to start. The doc located on Ultra Monkey is detailled, that's perfect.
In fact I had a look at Ultra Monkey but I wasn't able to find this topology out
of the ones listed on the web site when I searched. I found HA, LB, HA w/ LB,
but no Streamline HA & LB among the others by the past. Now I see it, so I'm
sorry if it was a dummy question.
An additional question : could you tell me if according to you it is a bad idea
to have such an architecture in production ? Versus HA w/ LB, there is twice
less machines, decreasing total cost and possible hardware failures, space
required, heat production, ... Am I wrong ?
Have a nice day and thanks again,
Best regards,
Laurent.
--
#############################################################
# Laurent Neiger | Centre Reseau & Informatique Commun #
# | Tel. : (0033) (0)4 76 88 79 91 #
# | Fax : (0033) (0)4 76 88 12 95 #
# | Web : http://cric.grenoble.cnrs.fr #
# CNRS Grenoble | mailto:Laurent.Neiger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx #
#############################################################
|
