LVS
lvs-users
Google
 
Web LinuxVirtualServer.org

Re: Firewalls loadbalancing issue

To: "LinuxVirtualServer.org users mailing list." <lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Firewalls loadbalancing issue
From: Horms <horms@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 4 Mar 2004 19:36:36 +0900
On Tue, Mar 02, 2004 at 07:08:05AM -0500, Joseph Mack wrote:
> Guillaume Arcas wrote:
> > 
> > Hi Joe (and others..).
> > 
> 
> > I think I now understand a little better why it is so hard ! :-)
> > Does it mean that I should put only proxyfying services on my realservers
> 
> possibly. 
> 
> I expect you could get LVS to do what you want, but I since LVS
> is meant to handle a small number of ports, while routers are meant
> to handle anything, it would be better to try some redundant router
> solution.

It probably wouldn't be too hard if you were to use a fwmark virtual
service or a zero-port persistant service.

-- 
Horms
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>