|
Thank you for your response. Still having some issues though.
> > 1) First, is this possible?
>
> I don't see why not. Its just LVS-DR with packets being forwarded
> to the real servers on the 192.168.0.0 network, right?
That's correct.
> > 2) What should the netmask of x.y.z.2 be on the realserver?
>
> x.y.z.2 should probably be on lo:0, in which case
> its netmask should be 255.255.255.255.
>
> If you really do want it on eth0 (I strongly doubt you do)
> then the netmask would be whatever the netmask for the x.y.z network is,
> presumably 255.255.255.0
Okay, I had that set correctly to 255.255.255.0. I have no other use for eth0
so I don't mind putting the VIP on it.
> > 3) What should the default gateway be for the realserver?
>
> x.y.z.1
Okay...I had this set correctly.
> > 4) Do I need a routable ip on eth0 other than the VIP? I'd rather it not
have
> > one.
>
> I can't see why you would need a routable IP on eth0, as long as
> you are routing replies out the interface.
>
> Unfortunately I don't think linux supports IP unnumbered, so you
> probably need some address on eth0. Logically something from the x.y.z
> network otehr than .1 or .2. But really there is nothing to stop you
> putting any address you like there.
As I said above, hopefully I can get this to work with just the VIP set to eth0.
> > 5) What should /sbin/route output look like on the realserver once this is
> > configured correctly?
>
> I guess something like this.
>
> 192.128.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0 eth1
> x.y.z.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0 eth0
> 0.0.0.0 x.y.x.1 0.0.0.0 UG 0 0 0 eth0
Well...that's exactly what it looks like alright. I think the only problem I
have left is that eth0 is still answering arps.
# for i in /proc/sys/net/ipv4/conf/*/hidden; do echo $i; cat $i; done
/proc/sys/net/ipv4/conf/all/hidden
1
/proc/sys/net/ipv4/conf/default/hidden
0
/proc/sys/net/ipv4/conf/eth0/hidden
1
/proc/sys/net/ipv4/conf/eth1/hidden
0
/proc/sys/net/ipv4/conf/lo/hidden
0
#
This looks right to me...why is this interface still answering arps?
Dan
P.S. This is a debian system running the 2.4.25 kernel with the hidden patch.
Nothing I've read indicates that this setup should have a problems, but I'm
mentioning it anyway.
|
