LVS
lvs-users
[Top] [All Lists]
Google
 
Web LinuxVirtualServer.org
<prev [Date] next> <prev [Thread] next>

RE: Is LVS in 2.6.x codebase stable for production?

from [Francois JEANMOUGIN] [Permanent Link]
To: "LinuxVirtualServer.org users mailing list." <lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: Is LVS in 2.6.x codebase stable for production?
From: "Francois JEANMOUGIN" <Francois.JEANMOUGIN@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2004 18:38:40 +0100 

Brett E. :
> Does anyone use it in production?

Is 2.6.x really suitable for production? I have to manage HA servers,
and I usually don't trust a Linux kernel before x.x.12 :))).

Sorry.

                            ___________________________
                   /|  /|  |                          |
                   ||__||  |       Please don't       |
                  /   O O\__           feed           |
                 /          \       the trolls        |
                /      \     \                        |
               /   _    \     \ ---------------------- 
              /    |\____\     \     ||                
             /     | | | |\____/     ||                
            /       \|_|_|/   |    __||                
           /  /  \            |____| ||                
          /   |   | /|        |      --|               
          |   |   |//         |____  --|               
   * _    |  |_|_|_|          |     \-/                
*-- _--\ _ \     //           |                        
  /  _     \\ _ //   |        /                        
*  /   \_ /- | -     |       |                         
  *      ___ c_c_c_C/ \C_c_c_c____________
[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  Is LVS in 2.6.x codebase stable for production?, Brett E.
Next by Date:  Re: Keepalived install paths, Joseph Mack
Previous by Thread:  Is LVS in 2.6.x codebase stable for production?, Brett E.
Next by Thread:  Error, Marcio_BRTurbo
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]