Re: Why do we use atomic_read with dest->weight when it's protected

lvs-users

Re: Why do we use atomic_read with dest->weight when it's protected

To:	"Brett E." <brettspamacct@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject:	Re: Why do we use atomic_read with dest->weight when it's protected
Cc:	"LinuxVirtualServer.org users mailing list." <lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
From:	Julian Anastasov <ja@xxxxxx>
Date:	Tue, 23 Mar 2004 10:58:09 +0200 (EET)

        Hello,

On Mon, 22 Mar 2004, Brett E. wrote:

> ..by a write lock?

        It was old decision. Now I do not see good reason.

Regards

--
Julian Anastasov <ja@xxxxxx>

[More with this subject...]

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Why do we use atomic_read with dest->weight when it's protected, Brett E. Re: Why do we use atomic_read with dest->weight when it's protected, Julian Anastasov <=

Previous by Date:	RE: Windows Media load balancing/dropped packets under medium load (test results), Mark Weaver
Next by Date:	close(i think) but no cigar, Randy Paries
Previous by Thread:	Why do we use atomic_read with dest->weight when it's protected, Brett E.
Next by Thread:	close(i think) but no cigar, Randy Paries
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]