LVS
lvs-users
Google
 
Web LinuxVirtualServer.org

Re: MTA (SMTP/POP) + LVS

To: "LinuxVirtualServer.org users mailing list." <lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: MTA (SMTP/POP) + LVS
From: François Chenais <francois@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2004 10:15:18 +0200
Hello, 

And what is the way to synchronise the mailboxes after someone has
retrieved his mail via POP ?

        François 


Le mar 23/03/2004 à 01:30, Horms a écrit :
> On Mon, Mar 22, 2004 at 07:42:17PM +0100, Harald Nesland wrote:
> > 
> > Just remember, the LVS-director would be single point of failure
(unless 
> > you've got more of them). A round-robin solution in the nameserver 
> > records could be safer. Though it's alot easier to control the LVS 
> > cluster. (Regarding DNS zone refresh, timeouts..)
> 
> It is pretty standard paractice to use two Linux Directors in
> an active/stand-by configration to remove the single point
> of failure.
> 
> LVS should give you much better control over your load balancing
> than and DNS solution. It also is able to react much more quickly to
> real server failures - no DNS timeouts. 



-- 
Debian SID
Linux tanna 2.6.5 #6 Thu Apr 15 12:55:26 CEST 2004 i686 GNU/Linux
Linux Counter #59413
PGP fingerprint : 9AFA 15EC 96C9 F607 EBC1  DD41 70C5 F0E0 25A5 105B

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>