|
I'm using a pair of IBM x345 with 4GB RAM and 2.66Ghz SMP for my LVS
directors. I am using LVS-NAT in order to do port translation and was
concerned initially about poor LVS-NAT performance.
I'm happy to report that LVS-NAT is NOT the bottleneck in my
environment. The surprise for me has been the somewhat poor performance
of Oracle9i/AS on my real servers, despite the beefy x445 hardware used
there.
Suffice it to say I have MANY visitors and LVS-NAT has thankfully moved
toward the bottom of my list of worries.
On Mon, 2004-04-26 at 09:41, Torvald Baade Bringsvor wrote:
> Hello.
>
> I am evaluating using LVS-NAT instead of LVS-DR (long story).
>
> Our customer however has some performance concerns, so what I would like to
> know is if any of you have evaluated the performance of LVS-NAT?
>
> The director is IBM X330, 1.2GHz PIII. Kernel 2.6.
>
> -Torvald
> _______________________________________________
> LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Send requests to lvs-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> or go to http://www.in-addr.de/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users
--
Ryan Leathers <ryan.leathers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Global Knowledge
|
