Re: When the director is the client.

[Julian Anastasov <ja@xxxxxx>]

        Hello,

On Wed, 12 May 2004, Joseph Mack wrote:

> Julian Anastasov wrote:
>
> >         So, now you can send packets in form DIP->VIP to real
> > servers (DR method)? I'm wondering how your patched director accepts
> > packets from real server in the form VIP->DIP.
>
> Is this the martian modification case? (director as default gw for LVS-DR?)
> or LVS-NAT

        Yes, but forward_shared works only for forwarded traffic
while such usage requires the validation to be relaxed even for
locally delivered traffic when the VIP is configured as IP address
in director.

> >         I see that you can remove the limitation when sending
> > packets but how do you accept the replies?
>
> Is this the same problem?

        Yes
Regards

--
Julian Anastasov <ja@xxxxxx>