|
Jacob Coby wrote:
>
>
> -t, --tcp-service service-address
the VIP:port that ip_vs intercepts on the director
> The -r option can also accept a port.
the dst_port that will be on the packet when it
exits the LVS-NAT director heading to the realserver.
in the case of LVS-DR, LVS-Tun, the -r port is ignored.
> Why is the port required if it isn't used?
It's not _required_ for any of the forwarding methods.
It's only used if its present with LVS-NAT
> Why is there a destination port if it isn't used?
Maybe it was easier than fixing up ivsadm to lock it out.
I guess ipvsadm should give a notice that it's ignoring
the -r port with LVS-DR and LVS-Tun.
> I'm just a little confused as to why it's so difficult to aggregate
> ports.
this is what fwmark does
> I'm also a little confused why anyone would want to aggregate
> the http and https ports.
I don't know either. He didn't tell us.
Joe
--
Joseph Mack PhD, High Performance Computing & Scientific Visualization
SAIC, Supporting the EPA Research Triangle Park, NC 919-541-0007
Federal Contact - John B. Smith 919-541-1087 - smith.johnb@xxxxxxx
|
