LVS
lvs-users
Google
 
Web LinuxVirtualServer.org

Re: Ldirectord does not load all real servers

To: "LinuxVirtualServer.org users mailing list." <lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Ldirectord does not load all real servers
From: Horms <horms@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 27 May 2004 13:30:24 +0900
On Thu, May 27, 2004 at 12:56:52PM +0900, Horms wrote:
> On Thu, May 27, 2004 at 11:47:03AM +1000, Jonathan Trott wrote:
> 
> [snip]
> 
> > >Are there any known problems with 1.87 I should be wary of? Is there  
> > >another version with the fallback fix but without this new bug? Can  
> > >anyone supply a patch so that I can fix this problem in 1.87?  
> > >Unfortunately I don't have the time to come to grips with the  
> > >ldirectord perl code :(
> > >Thanks,
> 
> > I have tried other versions of the code in CVS and the last one that  
> > worked for me was 1.86. After that I don't get all my pools containing  
> > real servers. I will test 1.86 and see if the fallback problem has been  
> > solved.
> > Who do I report bugs to regarding the 1.87 problem? BTW, the latest  
> > stable, 1.77.2.2 has the same problem as 1.87.
> 
> This list is fine. But please put something to highlight this
> as an ldirectord-related post in the title. CCing me can
> also help draw my attention - I get a lot of email and sometimes
> things stip through the cracks.
> 
> I made some changes in 1.87 which were merged into 1.77.2.2.
> These were intended to resolve some outstanding problem relating
> to the handling of real servers. It would seem some problems were
> introduced.
> 
> Ldirectord is pretty easy to debug, just run it in the perl debugger
> and you should be able to see what is going on. Failing that
> please send me your ldirector.cf file and a description of the problem -
> something a bit more detailed than what is above would help a lot.

Hi,

I have taken a quick look into this and I can see the problem.
I will post a fix when it is ready.

-- 
Horms
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>