Re: Compared performances fwm vs masq

[Horms <horms@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Fri, Jun 18, 2004 at 07:22:12PM +0200, Guillaume Arcas wrote:
> Hi all.
> 
> I'd like to know if there is any serious performance difference for using
> fwmark instead of masquerade method for load-balancing (DR not applicable
> in my case).

I do not understand your question.

MASQ and DR are forwarding mechanisms. 
They can both be used with fwmark virtual services.
Or the more regular ipaddress:port virtual services.
There shouldn't be a performance impact in using fwmarks.

-- 
Horms