|
Dear All,
I post my tcpdump data here to help analyse. Your advice is appreciated.
BTW:I had try to ping VIP(192.168.0.11) from client,But I got response, it's
not normal?
C:\Documents and Settings\Administrator>ping 192.168.0.11
Pinging 192.168.0.11 with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 192.168.0.11: bytes=32 time<10ms TTL=64
Reply from 192.168.0.11: bytes=32 time<10ms TTL=64
Reply from 192.168.0.11: bytes=32 time<10ms TTL=64
Reply from 192.168.0.11: bytes=32 time<10ms TTL=64
Ping statistics for 192.168.0.11:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 0ms, Maximum = 0ms, Average = 0ms
I make sure the real server's setting is fellow the HOWTO, here is the route
table in realserver:
(RIP:192.168.0.103 VIP:192.168.0.11) You can see VIP:192.168.0.11 's
netmask is 255.255.255.255
***************************************************************************
C:\Documents and Settings\Administrator>route print
===========================================================================
Interface List
0x1 ........................... MS TCP Loopback interface
0x9000002 ...02 00 4c 4f 4f 50 ...... MS LoopBack Driver
0xa000004 ...00 b0 d0 5f 5b c2 ...... 3Com EtherLink PCI
===========================================================================
===========================================================================
Active Routes:
Network Destination Netmask Gateway Interface Metric
0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 192.168.0.1 192.168.0.103 1
127.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 127.0.0.1 127.0.0.1 1
192.168.0.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.0.103 192.168.0.103 1
192.168.0.11 255.255.255.255 127.0.0.1 127.0.0.1 1
192.168.0.103 255.255.255.255 127.0.0.1 127.0.0.1 1
192.168.0.255 255.255.255.255 192.168.0.11 192.168.0.11 1
192.168.0.255 255.255.255.255 192.168.0.103 192.168.0.103 1
224.0.0.0 224.0.0.0 192.168.0.11 192.168.0.11 1
224.0.0.0 224.0.0.0 192.168.0.103 192.168.0.103 1
255.255.255.255 255.255.255.255 192.168.0.11 192.168.0.11 1
Default Gateway: 192.168.0.1
===========================================================================
Persistent Routes:
None
C:\Documents and Settings\Administrator>route delete 192.168.0.255 MASK 255.255
255.255 192.168.0.11
The route specified was not found.
***************************************************************************
=====================================
Dump from Realserver(RIP:192.168.0.103):
C:\Leo>windump -i 2 -i 3 -n "host not 192.168.0.1"
windump: listening on \Device\NPF_{E6BEC283-CD36-4B9B-9152-0D7B0CEB519F}
05:23:47.035132 arp who-has 192.168.0.104 tell 192.168.0.102
05:23:51.097654 IP 192.168.0.102 > 192.168.0.103: icmp 64: echo request seq 769
05:23:51.097732 IP 192.168.0.103 > 192.168.0.102: icmp 64: echo reply seq 769
05:23:51.097747 IP 192.168.0.102.1526 > 192.168.0.103.80: S 1350087924:135008792
4(0) win 5840 <mss 1460,sackOK,timestamp 615866 0,nop,wscale 0>
05:23:51.097805 IP 192.168.0.103.80 > 192.168.0.102.1526: S
396197602:396197602(0) ack 1350087925 win 65535 <mss 1460,nop,wscale
0,nop,nop,timestamp 0 0,nop,nop,sackOK>
05:23:51.097941 IP 192.168.0.102.1526 > 192.168.0.103.80: . ack 1 win 5840
<nop,nop,timestamp 615866 0>
05:23:51.098374 IP 192.168.0.102.1526 > 192.168.0.103.80: P 1:19(18) ack 1 win
5840 <nop,nop,timestamp 615866 0>
05:23:51.110770 IP 192.168.0.103.80 > 192.168.0.102.1526: . 1:1449(1448) ack 19
win 65517 <nop,nop,timestamp 3863684 615866>
05:23:51.110797 IP 192.168.0.103.80 > 192.168.0.102.1526: . 1449:2897(1448) ack
19 win 65517 <nop,nop,timestamp 3863684 615866>
05:23:51.110921 IP 192.168.0.103.80 > 192.168.0.102.1526: . 2897:2921(24) ack
19 win 65517 <nop,nop,timestamp 3863684 615866>
05:23:51.111200 IP 192.168.0.102.1526 > 192.168.0.103.80: . ack 1449 win 8688
<nop,nop,timestamp 615867 3863684>
05:23:51.111251 IP 192.168.0.103.80 > 192.168.0.102.1526: FP 2921:3991(1070)
ack 19 win 65517 <nop,nop,timestamp 3863684 615867>
05:23:51.111363 IP 192.168.0.102.1526 > 192.168.0.103.80: . ack 2897 win 11584
<nop,nop,timestamp 615867 3863684>
05:23:51.111376 IP 192.168.0.102.1526 > 192.168.0.103.80: . ack 2921 win 11584
<nop,nop,timestamp 615867 3863684>
05:23:51.111787 IP 192.168.0.102.1526 > 192.168.0.103.80: R 19:19(0) ack 3992
win 14480 <nop,nop,timestamp 615867 3863684>
05:24:00.708132 arp who-has 192.168.0.108 tell 192.168.0.102
05:24:01.707845 arp who-has 192.168.0.108 tell 192.168.0.102
05:24:02.707894 arp who-has 192.168.0.108 tell 192.168.0.102
18 packets captured
18 packets received by filter
0 packets dropped by kernel
C:\Leo>
=================================================================
Dump from director(RIP:192.168.0.102)
[root@localhost root]# tcpdump -n -i eth0 -i eth0:0 "host not 192.168.0.1 and
host not 192.168.0.111"
tcpdump: listening on eth0:0
05:23:38.223182 arp who-has 192.168.0.108 tell 192.168.0.102
05:23:39.222925 arp who-has 192.168.0.108 tell 192.168.0.102
05:23:40.222983 arp who-has 192.168.0.108 tell 192.168.0.102
05:23:47.551300 192.168.0.104.3558 > 192.168.0.102.http: S
2122540016:2122540016(0) win 65535 <mss 1460,nop,nop,sackOK> (DF)
05:23:47.551419 arp who-has 192.168.0.104 tell 192.168.0.102
05:23:47.551589 arp reply 192.168.0.104 is-at 0:a0:c9:72:ab:e9
05:23:47.551609 192.168.0.102.http > 192.168.0.104.3558: R 0:0(0) ack
2122540017 win 0 (DF)
05:23:47.961655 192.168.0.104.3558 > 192.168.0.102.http: S
2122540016:2122540016(0) win 65535 <mss 1460,nop,nop,sackOK> (DF)
05:23:47.961728 192.168.0.102.http > 192.168.0.104.3558: R 0:0(0) ack 1 win 0
(DF)
05:23:48.464586 192.168.0.104.3558 > 192.168.0.102.http: S
2122540016:2122540016(0) win 65535 <mss 1460,nop,nop,sackOK> (DF)
05:23:48.464665 192.168.0.102.http > 192.168.0.104.3558: R 0:0(0) ack 1 win 0
(DF)
05:23:51.613950 192.168.0.102 > 192.168.0.103: icmp: echo request (DF)
05:23:51.614066 192.168.0.102.1526 > 192.168.0.103.http: S
1350087924:1350087924(0) win 5840 <mss 1460,sackOK,timestamp 615866
0,nop,wscale 0> (DF)
05:23:51.614182 192.168.0.103 > 192.168.0.102: icmp: echo reply (DF)
05:23:51.614234 192.168.0.103.http > 192.168.0.102.1526: S
396197602:396197602(0) ack 1350087925 win 65535 <mss 1460,nop,wscale
0,nop,nop,timestamp 0 0,nop,nop,sackOK> (DF)
05:23:51.614282 192.168.0.102.1526 > 192.168.0.103.http: . ack 1 win 5840
<nop,nop,timestamp 615866 0> (DF)
05:23:51.614700 192.168.0.102.1526 > 192.168.0.103.http: P 1:19(18) ack 1 win
5840 <nop,nop,timestamp 615866 0> (DF)
05:23:51.627468 192.168.0.103.http > 192.168.0.102.1526: . 1:1449(1448) ack 19
win 65517 <nop,nop,timestamp 3863684 615866> (DF)
05:23:51.627517 192.168.0.102.1526 > 192.168.0.103.http: . ack 1449 win 8688
<nop,nop,timestamp 615867 3863684> (DF)
05:23:51.627675 192.168.0.103.http > 192.168.0.102.1526: . 1449:2897(1448) ack
19 win 65517 <nop,nop,timestamp 3863684 615866> (DF)
05:23:51.627701 192.168.0.102.1526 > 192.168.0.103.http: . ack 2897 win 11584
<nop,nop,timestamp 615867 3863684> (DF)
05:23:51.627678 192.168.0.103.http > 192.168.0.102.1526: . 2897:2921(24) ack 19
win 65517 <nop,nop,timestamp 3863684 615866> (DF)
05:23:51.627728 192.168.0.102.1526 > 192.168.0.103.http: . ack 2921 win 11584
<nop,nop,timestamp 615867 3863684> (DF)
05:23:51.627868 192.168.0.103.http > 192.168.0.102.1526: FP 2921:3991(1070) ack
19 win 65517 <nop,nop,timestamp 3863684 615867> (DF)
05:23:51.628124 192.168.0.102.1526 > 192.168.0.103.http: R 19:19(0) ack 3992
win 14480 <nop,nop,timestamp 615867 3863684> (DF)
05:24:01.224509 arp who-has 192.168.0.108 tell 192.168.0.102
05:24:02.224224 arp who-has 192.168.0.108 tell 192.168.0.102
05:24:03.224281 arp who-has 192.168.0.108 tell 192.168.0.102
28 packets received by filter
0 packets dropped by kernel
==================================================
(I closed another realserver<192.168.0.10> when I make capture)
>On 01 August 2004 07:27 ..... Leo said;
>
>>After 2 weeks testing, I come back and bother you again :-)
>
>>For now, I still can't open any page in client, and ActiveConn/InActConn in
>ipvsadm
>>is always 0.
>
>> Anyone can give me some advice?
>
>Have you run tcpdump and seen the request enter and leave your director ?
>
>Then, have you run some form of capture on RS to see if requests arrive and
>leave as expected?
>
>You may need to paste results of both here for more assistance.
>
>Obviously you have followed "ALL" the steps from the "How To" ?
>
>
>Laurie
>
Leo
fds3ssw@xxxxxxxxxxxx
2004-08-01
|
