![]() |
lvs-users
|
| To: | lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: LVS Directory behind two firewalls |
| From: | Jason Stubbs <jstubbs@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 8 Sep 2004 11:18:10 +0900 |
On Tuesday 07 September 2004 22:55, Joseph Mack wrote: > Jason Stubbs wrote: > > So, to state the question simply: How do I ensure that traffic takes the > > same outward path as its inward path? > > I haven't looked at your setup in detail, but does the SH scheduler meet > your needs? I don't believe a change in scheduler can solve the problem. I think Ryan Leathers is right in that it's a routing issue rather than an LVS-specific issue. Thank for your advice, though. Regards, Jason Stubbs |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Keepalived: sorry_server on directors?, Simon Young |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | routing problem with lvs?, Martin . Zehetmayer |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: LVS Directory behind two firewalls, Joseph Mack |
| Next by Thread: | RE: LVS Directory behind two firewalls, Ryan Leathers |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |