lvs-users
|
To: | "LinuxVirtualServer.org users mailing list." <lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: hidden patch still needed for 2.6? |
From: | Joseph Mack <mack.joseph@xxxxxxx> |
Date: | Wed, 12 Jan 2005 10:37:38 -0500 |
Michael Stiller wrote: > > Hi there, > > i noticed, that ipvs is now in the vanilla kernel, so no > patching is needed. But what about the "hidden" patch? > Is it still needed for direct routing lvs? Or is there another > way to disable arp for interfaces in 2.6? it's in the HOWTO. You can still use the hidden patch, but you can also use the arp_ignore flags in /proc Joe -- Joseph Mack PhD, High Performance Computing & Scientific Visualization LMIT, Supporting the EPA Research Triangle Park, NC 919-541-0007 Federal Contact - John B. Smith 919-541-1087 - smith.johnb@xxxxxxx |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | ipvsadm trees, Alejandro Mery |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: ipvsadm trees, Joseph Mack |
Previous by Thread: | hidden patch still needed for 2.6?, Michael Stiller |
Next by Thread: | Betr.: Re: [LVS-TUN] Squid boxes and connections?, Janno de Wit |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |