|
Horms wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jan 12, 2005 at 10:43:06AM -0500, Joseph Mack wrote:
> > Alejandro Mery wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi, i have a machine which boot both, linux2.4 and linux2.6. i want to
> > > use ipvs on both, what should i do with ipvsadm? can i use ipvsadm-1.24
> > > to admin lx2.4 or ipvsadm-1.21 for lx2.4 and 1.24 for lx2.6?
> >
> > The way they were written you have to use a version of ipvsadm for each
> > kernel. I would rather one giant ipvsadm that detects the kernel and does
> > the right thing. However Horms is the one who's doing most of the
> > maintenance
> > and he's happy with the way he's doing it.
>
> I am not sure that either of those stathements are true.
oh well. I need to have a few more beers with you in that case.
> I would definately rather ipvsadm had the same kind of
> semantics as modutils. That is something like this:
>
> You always invoke ipvsadm regardless of your kernel.
> If you only have ipvsadm-1.21 or ipvsadm-1.24 installed,
> then that is always run and it complains if there is a kernel
> version missmatch. If you have both installed then ipvsadm-1.24
> is always run, but if it detects a 2.4 kernel, then it execs
> ipvsadm 1.21.
OK that's fine with me.
> Also, the current version numbers are quite aquard,
^^^^^^
you've been in Japan too long :-) "awkward"
> As for who maintains the code. I have made modifications to it over
> time, as have others. But I always assumed that as with the kernel code
> the maintainer was Wensong.
thanks
Joe
--
Joseph Mack PhD, High Performance Computing & Scientific Visualization
LMIT, Supporting the EPA Research Triangle Park, NC 919-541-0007
Federal Contact - John B. Smith 919-541-1087 - smith.johnb@xxxxxxx
|
