![]() |
lvs-users
|
| To: | Horms <horms@xxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: LVS NAT packets not beein de-masquaraded |
| Cc: | lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| Cc: | wensong@xxxxxxxxxxxx |
| From: | Julian Anastasov <ja@xxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 4 Mar 2005 11:30:33 +0200 (EET) |
Hello,
If someone see such packet, is it looking like a fragmented
or what? Is it happening with 2.6.11?
On Fri, 4 Mar 2005, Horms wrote:
> Hi Joe,
>
> this definately is a problem that needs to be investigated.
> I don't have time right now as I am on holidays, but hopefully
> I will get a chance to look into it in the next week or so.
> But perhaps Wensong or Julian will get to it first.
Regards
--
Julian Anastasov <ja@xxxxxx>
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: LVS NAT packets not beein de-masquaraded, Horms |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: local node on failover server., Mack . Joseph |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: LVS NAT packets not beein de-masquaraded, Horms |
| Next by Thread: | Re: LVS NAT packets not beein de-masquaraded, Johan van den Berg |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |