lvs-users
|
To: | Horms <horms@xxxxxxxxxxxx> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: LVS NAT packets not beein de-masquaraded |
Cc: | lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
Cc: | wensong@xxxxxxxxxxxx |
From: | Julian Anastasov <ja@xxxxxx> |
Date: | Fri, 4 Mar 2005 11:30:33 +0200 (EET) |
Hello, If someone see such packet, is it looking like a fragmented or what? Is it happening with 2.6.11? On Fri, 4 Mar 2005, Horms wrote: > Hi Joe, > > this definately is a problem that needs to be investigated. > I don't have time right now as I am on holidays, but hopefully > I will get a chance to look into it in the next week or so. > But perhaps Wensong or Julian will get to it first. Regards -- Julian Anastasov <ja@xxxxxx> |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: LVS NAT packets not beein de-masquaraded, Horms |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: local node on failover server., Mack . Joseph |
Previous by Thread: | Re: LVS NAT packets not beein de-masquaraded, Horms |
Next by Thread: | Re: LVS NAT packets not beein de-masquaraded, Johan van den Berg |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |