LVS
lvs-users
Google
 
Web LinuxVirtualServer.org

Re: LVS-DR

To: "LinuxVirtualServer.org users mailing list." <lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: LVS-DR
From: Horms <horms@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2005 18:46:06 +0900
On Sat, Feb 05, 2005 at 01:08:48AM +0100, Josef Pospisil wrote:
> Horms wrote:
> 
> >On Wed, Feb 02, 2005 at 01:13:45AM -0500, Joseph Mack wrote:
> > 
> >
> >>Josef Pospisil wrote:
> >>   
> >>
> >>>Dear Mailinglist,
> >>>
> >>>I have got a problem with LVS-DR. I have set it up like in the
> >>>LVS-Mini-Howto
> >>><http://www.austintek.com/LVS/LVS-HOWTO/mini-HOWTO/LVS-mini-HOWTO.html>
> >>>and everything worked fine as long as the client Computer was in the
> >>>same subnet as the director and realservers. Than I thougt i could give
> >>>it try when the client is placed somewhere in the Internet. I have set
> >>>the Router up to forward traffic which is going to port 80 to the VIP
> >>>192.168.1.110. And of course i have set up a default route on the
> >>>realservers which is directing to the router (the realservers are both
> >>>running a HTTP-Server). So now the Client is connecting via www to the
> >>>router and he is beeing redirected to the VIP 192.168.1.110. But somehow
> >>>this setup doesnt work. I can't see any of the websites placed on the
> >>>realservers. But when i forward the traffic directly to one of the
> >>>realservers everything just works fine. I have really no idea why this
> >>>isn't working and would be glad if someone could help me. And plz don't
> >>>blame me if the problem is obvious.
> >>>     
> >>>
> >>The router might be wierd (look for "wierd hardware" in the HOWTO).
> >>
> >>Does it still work if you have two networks on the LVS and take out the 
> >>router?
> >>   
> >>
> >
> >I would try running tcpdump on your Linux Director, and also
> >examining the connection table - ipvsadm -Lcn, to try
> >and track down the point of the breakage. In particular, to
> >see if the packets are making it to the linux director at all.
> >And if so, are they being recognised as being for the Virtual Service,
> >perhaps there is some strangeness in the destination IP of the packets
> >that causes LVS not to recognise them.
> >
> > 
> >
> Now i solved the Problem it was the router making trouble. It wasn't 
> enaugh to forward Port 80 (via IPCOPs webinterface)  to the VIP. I also 
> had to add some IPTable rules manualy. Thanks for the help.

Thanks, glad to hear that your problem was resolved.

-- 
Horms

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • Re: LVS-DR, Horms <=