LVS
lvs-users
Google
 
Web LinuxVirtualServer.org

Re: Ldirectod v feedbackd

To: "LinuxVirtualServer.org users mailing list." <lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Ldirectod v feedbackd
From: Horms <horms@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2005 15:18:34 +0900
On Mon, Mar 07, 2005 at 06:01:18PM +0000, Graham Purcocks wrote:
> Hi
> 
> This is my second pass at LVS routers. I build a pair 4 years ago with 
> pulse/nanny and RH73 LVS kernel but have now decided it is time to bring 
> them up to date. The old ones have been so reliable that you forget 
> about them. The hardware it getting old and we had a couple of issues 
> recently so new boxes and new install is happening. In fact until that 
> time we have *never* had no service due to server/cluster problems, so 
> great job to all who contribute.
> 
> I am using Ultramonkey for simplicity, so currently they are being 
> tested with ldirectord. However, the old system had dynamic weighting 
> using ruptime to alter the weightings. I noticed feedbackd, but does 
> this work well *with* ldirectord? It seems to also try to take servers 
> out so may conflict. I don't want an unreliable system so should I leave 
> well alone and stick with ldirectord sn simple fixed weighting or can 
> feedbackd live harmoniously with it?

I imagine that such a setup would work, but I have not tried it myself.

-- 
Horms

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>