LVS
lvs-users
Google
 
Web LinuxVirtualServer.org

Re: LVS trhough firewall with IP Tunneling or Direct Routing

To: "LinuxVirtualServer.org users mailing list." <lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: LVS trhough firewall with IP Tunneling or Direct Routing
From: Elton Ramos Carvalho <elton.lista@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2005 13:57:14 -0300
Horms wrote:

On Fri, Mar 04, 2005 at 10:29:41AM -0300, Elton Ramos Carvalho wrote:
Hello,

I have this network diagram....
H.H.H.H eth0 eth1 Z.Z.Z.Z (INTERNET) ---------- FIREWALL---------SWITCH---------(DMZ)

where....

eth0 and eth1 is valids IP address in diferents subnets

eth0 X.X.X.X/248  ...firewall and router subnet
eth1 X.X.X.X/240   ....my dmz

H.H.H.H smtp1
Z.Z.Z.Z   smtp2

I want...
.....a VIP address that respont to my 2 mail servers(duh)...
.....that my FIREWALL act as the DIRECTOR but using "direct routing" or "ip tunneling" (with nat this works fine).
   Is it possible?
I did some tests and when the datagram back to source IP, it stop in eth1 with "martian source" error.

I take it the problem here is that your Real Servers are
using the Linux-Director/Firewall as the default gatway.
This works wonderfully with NAT, and is actually a requirement,
but for DR the return packets are discarded by the
Linux-Director/Firewall as they look like martians (packets sent
from the Linux-Director/Firewall via the Linux-Director/Firewall).

Try looking in the HOWTO for some info on martians.
I have never had much success with this myself, but I believe that it can be made to work.



Tks Horms....

I will look for


Elton Ramos Carvalho

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>