Re: LVS Choices for Active-Active

[Horms <horms@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Tue, Apr 05, 2005 at 03:13:37PM -0500, Jim Miller wrote:
> Hello everyone,
> 
> I'm going to begin dipping my toes into LVS and an active-active director
> configuration.
> 
> When implementing an active-active director configuration is it best to
> implement LVS-NAT, LVS-TUN or LVS-DR?

It depends what you mean by active-active, but my experimentation
in the past with making more than once linux-director handle the
same VIP at the same time was with LVS-NAT and LVS-DR, and they both
worked.

-- 
Horms