lvs-users
|
|
lvs-users
|
| To: | jimm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, <lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | RE: [newbie] LVS and Traffic Balancing |
| From: | Mack.Joseph@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| Date: | Wed, 13 Apr 2005 15:49:54 -0400 |
Joseph Mack PhD, High Performance Computing & Scientific Visualisation LMIT, Supporting the EPA Research Triangle Park, NC 919-541-0007 Federal Infrastructure Contact-Ravi Nair 919-541-5467 - nair.ravi@xxxxxxx, Federal Visualization Contact - Joe Retzer, Ph.D. 919-541-4190 - retzer.joseph@xxxxxxx lvs-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote on 04/13/2005 02:23:49 PM: > After reading the fwmark page, I was curious, would this > work in a NON-NAT (DR) configuration? Yes fwmark is a way of marking incoming packets. All of the schedulers work with fwmarked packets. Joe |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | RE: [newbie] LVS and Traffic Balancing, Peter Mueller |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Connection lost after running rc.lvs_dr script, Jeff Kilbride |
| Previous by Thread: | RE: [newbie] LVS and Traffic Balancing, Jim Miller |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [newbie] LVS and Traffic Balancing, Horms |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |