lvs-users
|
To: | "LinuxVirtualServer.org users mailing list." <lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: Distributed file system, which one would you consider? |
From: | Nate Carlson <natecars@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Mon, 25 Apr 2005 14:04:24 -0500 (CDT) |
On Fri, 22 Apr 2005, Jan Klopper wrote: > Place hooks in the filesystem, to run the cluster tool on write. > The cluster tool propogates the changes to both neighbouring servers, I don't know of anything that's free, but there are a few commercial options, that actually act as an underlaying file system: PeerFS http://www.radiantdata.com/ Constant Replicator http://www.constantdata.com/products/cr.php There may be more, but these are hte ones I am familiar with. -- Nate Carlson <natecars@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> | Phone : (952)943-8700 http://www.real-time.com | Fax : (952)943-8500 |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: LVS / Keepalived and a strange problem..., Graeme Fowler |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Random adding and deleting of real servers, Dave Thacker |
Previous by Thread: | Re: Distributed file system, which one would you consider?, Patrick Walsh |
Next by Thread: | Re: Distributed file system, which one would you consider?, gan hawk |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |