|
Yup it is a TCP open it uses SOCK_STREAM, you need SOCK_DGRAM for udp.
Wouldn't think it would take much of a change. I'll see if it works but
I still don't know if it tells you anything.
On Thu, 2005-05-12 at 17:54, Graham David Purcocks M.A.(Oxon.) wrote:
> OK. Checked it and the port checker is tcp only is specifically excludes
> udp protocol.
>
> The checking code opens a tcp port I think, but I'm sure there must be
> an equivalent udp port open/close it could use.
>
> It could be simply that as UDP is connection-less opening/closing a udp
> port tells you nothing. I'm rusty on my socket stuff so I can't tell
> you.
>
> Sorry.
>
> On Thu, 2005-05-12 at 14:03, Malcolm Turnbull wrote:
> > Graham David Purcocks M.A.(Oxon.) wrote:
> >
> > >I'm missing something. The connect check type just opens and closes a
> > >connection based on the protocol. So if the service is udp, why don't
> > >you have protocol=udp? Why do you want a TCP check when its a UDP
> > >service?
> > >
> > >
> > Well what I'd really like is a UDP connect check for a UDP service but
> > that doesn't seem to work.
> >
> > For instance if you do :
> >
> > virtual=10.0.1.31:53 gate Test_DNS
> > real=10.0.0.50:53 gate 1
> > fallback=127.0.0.1:53
> > service=none
> > checktype=connect
> > scheduler=wrr
> > protocol=udp
> >
> > It wont work... (NB. obviously in production I want to use a different
> > port than 53 but its an easy one to test
> > But :
> > service=dns
> > will work because of the special handling.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Send requests to lvs-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > or go to http://www.in-addr.de/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users
--
|
