lvs-users
|
To: | Dave Whitla <dave.whitla@xxxxxxxxx> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: Local Nodes (NOT Local Node) |
Cc: | "LinuxVirtualServer.org users mailing list." <lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
From: | Horms <horms@xxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Tue, 21 Jun 2005 10:39:25 +0900 |
On Tue, Jun 21, 2005 at 09:26:20AM +1000, Dave Whitla wrote: > Thanks Horms, > > This should be suitable to test as is. I'll see about making it remote > NAT friendly and repost if I can. Thanks, I have been having some ideas on how to do that myself, which revolve around a inet_addr_type(udest->addr) == RTN_LOCAL test in the nat_xmit function. I should also point out that the patch below will probably also break LVS-DR and LVS-TUN for local real servers. Its really just a quick way to test if Local LVS-NAT is a sensible thing or not. -- Horms |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: Local Nodes (NOT Local Node), Dave Whitla |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: Local Nodes (NOT Local Node), Horms |
Previous by Thread: | Re: Local Nodes (NOT Local Node), Dave Whitla |
Next by Thread: | Re: Local Nodes (NOT Local Node), Horms |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |