|
Actually, to clarify, it is only active FTP that fails on the new
load-balancers. Passive FTP works fine. It should also be noted that
active FTP has no trouble whatsoever on the current machines running
2.4.26.
--Don
On Tue, 2005-08-30 at 17:30 +0000, Donald J Giuliano wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm currently working to migrate two linux-2.4/keepalived IPVS
> load-balancers to new machine running linux-2.6/keepalived.
> Everything works perfectly on the old setup, but on the new machines
> the load-balanced FTP fails when the client is behind a NAT
> firewall. I'm running the Antefacto ipvs-nfct patch on both the 2.4.26
> and 2.6.12 configuration so that the LBs can also function as
> firewalls. I have made no changes to the iptables configuration,
> other than removing some superfluous rules filtering "unclean" packets,
> which aren't supported in 2.6 anyway. All the same IPVS kernel modules
> are loaded on both machines. The keepalived configurations are
> identical. Any idea what would cause this problem?
>
|
