LVS
lvs-users
Google
 
Web LinuxVirtualServer.org

RE: 'no hit' for LVS connection tracking (SYN+ACK not translated)

To: "Julian Anastasov" <ja@xxxxxx>
Subject: RE: 'no hit' for LVS connection tracking (SYN+ACK not translated)
Cc: "LinuxVirtualServer.org users mailing list." <lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
From: "Jari Takkala" <Jari.Takkala@xxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 6 Sep 2005 11:43:39 -0400
Hi Julian,

We do not have an FTP service on the same VIP as an HTTP with persistance. Here 
is the full output from ipvsadm. All of our services are on different VIP's. 

# ipvsadm -l -n
IP Virtual Server version 1.0.11 (size=4096)
Prot LocalAddress:Port Scheduler Flags
  -> RemoteAddress:Port           Forward Weight ActiveConn InActConn
TCP  10.99.23.64:80 wlc persistent 300
  -> 10.99.22.58:80               Masq    1      8          0
  -> 10.99.22.53:80               Masq    1      8          6
  -> 10.99.22.215:80              Masq    1      8          2
TCP  10.99.23.54:80 wlc persistent 300
TCP  10.99.23.51:80 wlc persistent 300
  -> 10.99.22.199:80              Masq    1      30         1
  -> 10.99.22.197:80              Masq    1      26         2
TCP  10.99.23.98:5061 wlc
  -> 10.99.22.252:5061            Masq    1      0          0
  -> 10.99.22.251:5061            Masq    1      0          0

The following appears in the output when the FTP service is added (currently 
removed due to the problems it is causing).

TCP  10.99.23.57:21 wlc
  -> 10.99.22.208:21              Masq    1      0          0
  -> 10.99.22.207:21              Masq    1      0          0

Unfortunately it does not sound like your patch would solve the problem in this 
case. Do you have any other ideas?

Jari


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>