Re: One-packet scheduling for kernel 2.6

[Nicolas Baradakis <nbk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Julian Anastasov wrote:

> On Sun, 2 Oct 2005, Wensong Zhang wrote:
>
> > I agree to including this one-packet feature into kernel 2.6.15+.
>
>       Also, we should not sync these packets, there should be
> check in ip_vs_in before calling ip_vs_sync_conn. But ops looks
> valid only for DR/TUN setups, not for NAT, so better not to hurry
> without checking everything. Nicolas, what is the used forwarding
> method and are there any RADIUS replies?

In the RADIUS protocol it's the same for authentication and
accounting: a single UDP packet for the request and a single
UDP packet for the reply.

I'm using the one-packet scheduling in a direct routing setup,
therefore the LVS servers don't have to forward the replies.

-- 
Nicolas Baradakis