ankush grover wrote:
> hey friends,
>
> My present scenario is such
>
> LVS
> RIP: 192.168.1.42 <http://192.168.1.42>
> VIP:192.168.1.58 <http://192.168.1.58>
>
> Real Servers
>
> Real Server 1:
> RIP: 192.168.1.67 <http://192.168.1.67>
> VIP: 192.168.1.58 <http://192.168.1.58>
>
> Real Server 2:
> RIP: 192.168.1.68 <http://192.168.1.68>
> VIP: 192.168.1.58 <http://192.168.1.58>
>
> Both the real servers are running Apache service.
>
>
> Clients connects to the LVS and the LVS sends the request to the real
> servers.Clients are also within the same network
> domain(192.168.1.0/24<http://192.168.1.0/24>
> ).
>
>
> Now the scenario will be like this
>
> The change in the scenario is due to mysql clustering.The mysql people
> recommend a separate LAN for mysql clustering.
>
> clients: 192.168.1.0/24 <http://192.168.1.0/24> domain
>
> LVS:
> eth0: 192.168.1.42 <http://192.168.1.42>
> eth1:10.0.0.1 <http://10.0.0.1>
>
> Real Server1: 10.0.0.2 <http://10.0.0.2>
> Real Server2: 10.0.0.3 <http://10.0.0.3>
>
> Now how do I configure LVS for this setup.Earlier I was using LVS-DR now I
> have to use LVS-NAT or LVS-DR will work for this scenario also .Clients in
> this scenario will be in the network domain
> (192.168.1.0<http://192.168.1.0>)and
> the real servers will be in a separate network
> domain(10.0.0.0/8<http://10.0.0.0/8>
> ).
>
>
> Please guide me how to configure LVS for the new scenario.I am using Fedora
> Core 3(Redhat Distribution) for LVS & Real Servers.
>
> Thanks & Regards
>
> Ankush Grover
Ankush -
Unfortunately I cannnot provide any suggestions, however, I think I can
come up with a question for you, if you don't mind. I'm a bit new, so
I'm still learning.
Why would the Real Servers share the same VIP?
Thanks for your patience
-dant
|