|
Horms,
Not te be provoking, but didn't you get the email from malcolm?
>Does anyone in the core LVS team need some more harware to play with?
>I'm feeling charitable as I've made a few pennies out of your hard work.
>
>Regards,
>Malcolm.
I guess he states that if you need nay hardware you should just ask, right?
Maybe he's feeling charitable enough too spare you just such a xeon system.
Clearly it would help the development of the software, and having an
extra xeon around never really hurst now does it?
If there are any political reasons why not to respond to his offer which
im clearly unaware off, please ignore me.
greets
Jan
Horms wrote:
On Wed, Oct 12, 2005 at 08:38:40AM +0200, Christophe Yayon wrote:
Last month there was a long thread about a top load average display on
xeon system with ipvs_syncmaster.
Does anybody have some news about this problem ? Is there an official
patch ?
That thread moved over to netdev, to try and get more kernel-hacker
eyes on the problem. But we are yet to find a solution. There are
however 2 patches floating around for testing. If you could test them
both that would be awsesome, I do not have hardware to do so.
[Head of netdev thread]
http://oss.sgi.com/archives/netdev/2005-09/msg00059.html
[Patch 1]
http://oss.sgi.com/archives/netdev/2005-09/msg00061.html
[Patch 2]
http://oss.sgi.com/archives/netdev/2005-09/msg00062.html
|
