LVS
lvs-users
Google
 
Web LinuxVirtualServer.org

Re: FTP Bug Maybe?

To: "LinuxVirtualServer.org users mailing list." <lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: FTP Bug Maybe?
From: "Peter J Milanese" <PMilanese@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2005 06:32:22 -0500
Did you try using passive ftp on your clients? You have a lot of natting going 
on and ftp is notorious for problems with this. Can you do a one to one nat on 
any of the firewalls?

P

-----------------
Sent from my NYPL BlackBerry Handheld.


----- Original Message -----
From: lvs-users-bounces
Sent: 11/01/2005 06:24 AM
To: lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: FTP Bug Maybe?

Hey guys

First a very small "success story".
I've been using LVS/NAT for 4 months or so to load balance 2 IIS6 Servers.
it's doing 5 Mbit traffic mainly https.
I'm using Fedora core 4 and Ultramonky, it's a single director setup.

Now for the problem :)
Most of the traffic is https (persistent).
i've noticed that the firewall infront of the lvs box is droping
packets originating for the iis servers behind the LVS. since the LVS
is  NAT'ing the Web server this is weird.

Google'd a little bit and noticed that in the LVS-HOWTO they mention a
FTP BUG 
(http://www.austintek.com/LVS/LVS-HOWTO/HOWTO/LVS-HOWTO.LVS-NAT.html#LVS-NAT_ftp_bug)

Since my setup is LVS/NAT and i also maped ftp to one of the servers
(without load balancing), i had to load ip_vs_ftp and ip_nat_ftp.
so it looks like it's the ftp bug

To solve this I'm planning reinstalling the box with a custom kernel
applied with the patches  suggested in the article.

Does anyone know if there's a distro with those patches already applied?
Could it be something else causing the problem?


Thanks

Tomer Okavi.

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>