LVS
lvs-users
Google
 
Web LinuxVirtualServer.org

RE: Stats for a webserver

To: "'LinuxVirtualServer.org users mailing list.'" <lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: Stats for a webserver
From: "Mark" <msalists@xxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2005 16:15:30 -0800
I think what Joseph meant was whether they get mingled in a way that a line (or 
log entry) of server A hits the log in the middle of
writing an entry for server B, thereby destroying both entries and causing 
syntax errors.
Could that happen, or is something making sure that it will not?

MARK


> -----Original Message-----
> From: lvs-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
> [mailto:lvs-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf 
> Of Todd Lyons
> Sent: Thursday, December 22, 2005 3:58 PM
> To: lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: Stats for a webserver
> 
> 
> On Thu, Dec 22, 2005 at 03:08:01PM -0800, Joseph Mack NA3T wrote:
> 
> >>You tell syslog or syslog-ng to log to a remote network 
> source instead 
> >>of or in addition to a local file on each of the real 
> servers, then on 
> >>the central logging server configure it to listen for 
> incoming network 
> >>log info and tell it where to put it.
> >can connections from logging machines collide, ie the text
> >from the two streams are mingled, or does the log server 
> >spool the writes?
> 
> The two streams are mingled.  I would assume that you could 
> seperate it based on host, but I've not tried to do that.
> -- 
> Regards...            Todd
> I've visited conferences where the wireless LAN was deemed "secure" by
> the organisation because they had outlawed sniffers.    --Neils Bakker
> Linux kernel 2.6.12-12mdksmp   3 users,  load average: 0.15, 
> 0.16, 0.18
> _______________________________________________
> LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - 
> lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Send requests to 
> lvs-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> or go to http://www.in-addr.de/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users
> 


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>