|
Hi all,
I've got a same problem. I have lb + 2 real serves behind NAT.
I need to specify lb as gw on both real servers. SNAT can avoid this,
but
6) The LB rewrites the packet and sends it back to the internet client.
As far as I know, IPVS doesn't have this feature for SNAT.
Correct me, if I were wrong.
Any suggestions?
Thanks in advance!
----- Original Message -----
From: "spamsucks72" <spamsucks72@xxxxxxx>
To: <lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Monday, February 27, 2006 6:11 PM
Subject: LVS Question?
Hello All,
I am working on a trying to use LVS to do the following.
My question is can an open source load balancer function like my old
(broken) F5 in the architecture below?
Here is the current load balancer architecture with the F5:
Requirements
1) There is only IP sub network (164.99.13.1, 255.255.255.224, broadcast
164.99.131.31)
2) Load balancer setup to use only one NIC (F5 calls it Load balancer on a
stick)
Example:
Virtual IP address and port: 164.99.13.21:80
GW (Firewall): 164.99.13.1 (Box1)
Real Servers: 164.99.13.11 (Box2), 164.99.13.12 (Box3)
Load Balancer Real: 164.99.13.2 (Box4)
Load Balancer SNAT: 164.99.13.3
The Current flow of traffic:
1) Internet Client accesses 164.99.13.21
2) FW Box1 passes traffic to the Load balancer
3) The LB rewrites the packet putting the SNAT address in as the client
4) The LB sends the new packet the chosen real server (based on whatever
algorithm is being used - Round Robin)
5) The real server serves up the page back the SNAT (LB) address.
6) The LB rewrites the packet and sends it back to the internet client.
Has anyone set something like that up or know of a way to set something
like
that up? I have setup LVS with 2 NICs and networks, where the LB is the
FW
too but I can not do that in this case.
Any thoughts?
Thanks, JMF
_______________________________________________
LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Send requests to lvs-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
or go to http://www.in-addr.de/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users
| 