|
There was a pretty busy thread about this topic a few months ago. Take a look
at the archive.
The overall consent was that you do not need a lot of resources at all - it's
more about reliability than performance/power.
MARK
> -----Original Message-----
> From:
> lvs-users-bounces+msalists=gmx.net@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:lvs-users-bounces+msalists=gmx.net@linuxvirtualserver.
> org] On Behalf Of Vasiliy Boulytchev
> Sent: Friday, March 03, 2006 9:06 AM
> To: lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Hardware Recomendations
>
>
>
> Gents,
> I have a new cluster to build for our single web
> application. Web
> app is running php/mysql in the background.
>
> Would really like to hear what everyone has to say about hardware
> requirements for the loadbalancer. The environment will be
> NAT, which
> naturally adds more strain on the balancer. Would you say
> that a dual
> P4, with 2GB ram would do the job for 100K concurrent
> connections? Or
> should we look at something like Alteon or Cisco?
>
> What are your expreriences? :)
>
> THANKS GUYS!
>
> PS also in #linux-ha, lets chat :)
>
> --
> Vasiliy Boulytchev
> Colorado Information Technologies
> www.coinfotech.com
>
> _______________________________________________
> LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Send requests to lvs-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> or go to http://www.in-addr.de/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users
>
|
