|
> Given the high quality of all the other LVS code I wouldn't jump to the
> conclusion that the SH scheduler doesn't work for production sites.
Well.. I had tested several of the schedulers in a production environment.. I
tried to balance 7 proxies cache, with a 200mbit/s traffic ( balancer gets
around 20mbit/s in DR mode ).
With SH we got several kernel panics... as it was in production I couln't look
into it. That was with a 2.6.9 kernel... I haven't tested with 2.6.16 (17)
kernel yet.
>
> For a start SH gives exactly the same kind of response as persistence
> and it's layer 4 based on source hash...
|
