![]() |
lvs-users
|
| To: | "LinuxVirtualServer.org users mailing list." <lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: one more fallback doesn't work & question about feedbackd |
| From: | Malte Geierhos <malte@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 20 Jul 2006 08:34:05 +0200 |
Hi Yep, I need to update it to work with recent kernels. Are people still interested in using feedbackd? If so, I'll get on to it!For sure ! I believe without something like this LVS - balancing not really balancing. It's more like connection distribution - real balancing can only be done, if there's feedback from the backends.Needless to say i'm very interested in this - and i think a lot of people not subscribed, too. Perhaps it's possible to add disk-activity in means of the Wait IO percentage into account. That would be great! thx, malte |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: one more fallback doesn't work & question about feedbackd, Jeremy Kerr |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: one more fallback doesn't work & question about feedbackd, Jeremy Kerr |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: one more fallback doesn't work & question about feedbackd, Jeremy Kerr |
| Next by Thread: | Re: one more fallback doesn't work & question about feedbackd, Jeremy Kerr |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |