Yo!
Todd wrote:
The only caveat has been that when both are online (that is..in
active/passive mode and under heartbeat control), you can see the
passive cluster node printer shares alongside the active node's 13
printer shares in the form of printershare@nodename. Each share is
duplicated! What were shooting for is transparency and I'm beginning
to wonder if we're chasing after the wind. I've seen a few claims of
Samba clustering with Novell iPrint and Lifekeeper software vendors.
(If anyone has experience with those products, please let me know.)
This is more of a samba-specific issue. My first guess would be that
nmbd is listening on 0.0.0.0 interface and your server has more than one
interface to windows network configured - VIP interface and another one
(perhaps for administration). I think nmbd does so by default, even if
you have set smbd to listen on a specific interface - there is a
configuration option to disable this behaviour.
The available open source software may not be evolved enough to
accomplish this kind of cluster implementation. I would really
appreciate an insightful answer on this as soon as conveniently
possible.
Or did I oversimplify the problem in some aspect?
Siim Põder
_______________________________________________
LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Send requests to lvs-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
or go to http://www.in-addr.de/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users
