lvs-users
|
To: | "LinuxVirtualServer.org users mailing list." <lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: Cannot get ipvs fwmark service to work |
From: | Siim Põder <windo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Tue, 10 Oct 2006 13:13:24 +0300 |
Yo! Mindaugas Riauba wrote: > Just one more stupid question. In my case what are advantages of LVS > versus iptables multiple DNAT target or CLUSTER target? > More load balancing algorithms. What else? multiple DNAT has been dropped in latest kernels and it does not support weights (and less load balancing algorithms). do you mean CLUSTERIP target? i hadn't looked into it and it seems kind of cool, but alas, not much going on with it... or is there?! lvs has quite a bit of infra/soulutions built on it. Siim Põder |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: all clients disconnect on failover, Siim Põder |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: all clients disconnect on failover, Sebastian Vieira |
Previous by Thread: | Re: Cannot get ipvs fwmark service to work, Joseph Mack NA3T |
Next by Thread: | Re: Cannot get ipvs fwmark service to work, Mindaugas |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |