LVS
lvs-users
Google
 
Web LinuxVirtualServer.org

RE: 700 Mbit/s connection and squids

To: "LinuxVirtualServer.org users mailing list." <lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: 700 Mbit/s connection and squids
From: "Shaun Mccullagh" <Shaun.Mccullagh@xxxxx>
Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2006 16:25:43 +0100
Hi,

Horms has tested LVS with 3,000,000 connections.

Please could list the documentation sources that you have read as I'd be
very interested.

Shaun

-----Original Message-----
From: lvs-users-bounces+shaun.mccullagh=xb.nl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:lvs-users-bounces+shaun.mccullagh=xb.nl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Joseph Mack NA3T
Sent: Tuesday, November 21, 2006 4:21 PM
To: LinuxVirtualServer.org users mailing list.
Subject: Re: 700 Mbit/s connection and squids

On Tue, 21 Nov 2006, john colson wrote:

> Hi,
>   We would like to use LVS in a system where 700Mbit/s traffic is
flowing
> through it. Concurrent connection number is about 420.000   . Our main
> purpose for using LVS is to direct 80. port requests into number of
squid
> servers (~80 servers)
> I have read performance documents and I just wonder I can handle this
much
> of traffic with a 2x3.2 Xeon  and 4GB of RAM of hardware or not

I assume you're talking about specifications for the 
director.

o SMP doesn't help (see HOWTO)

o the director is a router only (with slightly unusual 
rules). All it's doing is routing. If your proposed hardware 
can handle the network throughput, that's all that's 
involved. You only need enough memory to run the OS and 
handle the connections. I don't remember how many 
bytes/connection but at 0.5M connections, that would only be 
a few MBytes of memory

Joe
-- 
Joseph Mack NA3T EME(B,D), FM05lw North Carolina
jmack (at) wm7d (dot) net - azimuthal equidistant map
generator at http://www.wm7d.net/azproj.shtml
Homepage http://www.austintek.com/ It's GNU/Linux!




Op dit e-mailbericht is een disclaimer van toepassing, welke te vinden is op 
http://www.xb.nl/disclaimer.html




<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>