LVS
lvs-users
[Top] [All Lists]
Google
 
Web LinuxVirtualServer.org
<prev [Date] next> <prev [Thread] next>

Re: LVS/TUN and Windows

from [Paolo Penzo] [Permanent Link]
To: "LinuxVirtualServer.org users mailing list." <lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: LVS/TUN and Windows
From: Paolo Penzo <paolo.penzo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 06 Dec 2006 16:13:59 +0100
We made a layer2 network spanned across geographical sites and moved to DR balancing: everthing is much more easy to manage! 
Regards,
Paolo.

Richard Seabrook wrote:

Hi,
Since Windows 2003 doesn't support IP-in-IP like 2000 did, what other alternatives are people using when real servers are remote from the directors? 

Thanks,
[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  LVS/TUN and Windows, Richard Seabrook
Next by Date:  Re: Lots of ActiveConn very few InActConn, G. Allen Morris III
Previous by Thread:  LVS/TUN and Windows, Richard Seabrook
Next by Thread:  LVS + keepalived problem, Navid Rahimi
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]