lvs-users
|
To: | "LinuxVirtualServer.org users mailing list." <lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: Ldirectord realserver connection refused LVS-TUN |
Cc: | linux-ha@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
From: | Niraj Patel <niraj@xxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Wed, 13 Dec 2006 16:05:21 -0500 |
Would it be possible (or make sense) to run Ldirectord on machines other than the directors? Joseph Mack NA3T wrote: On Tue, 12 Dec 2006, Niraj Patel wrote:I saw that part but then how does ldirectord make its negotiation checks?I don't know how ldirectord does it, but for mon...on the realserver you have the service listening to the VIP _and_ the RIP. Health checking on the director checks the service on the RIP. You hope that the state of the service on the RIP reflects the service running on the VIP.Does this also mean that you *MUST* run iptables in order to have LVS-TUN work with failover and still have the flexibility of using ldirectord?don't know sorry Joe |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [noob] direct routing with only one routable ip?, Joseph Mack NA3T |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: Ldirectord realserver connection refused LVS-TUN, Arthur Kao |
Previous by Thread: | Re: Ldirectord realserver connection refused LVS-TUN, Joseph Mack NA3T |
Next by Thread: | Re: Ldirectord realserver connection refused LVS-TUN, Arthur Kao |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |